Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
Saturday 09 November 2024, 12:55:53 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Download the latest community FREE version  HERE
14250 Posts in 4377 Topics by 6515 Members
Latest Member: hulteends
Search:     Advanced search
+  EFW Support
|-+  Support
| |-+  EFW SMTP, HTTP, SIP, FTP Proxy Support
| | |-+  URL rewrite or other method to block google wireless transcoder (gwt)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: URL rewrite or other method to block google wireless transcoder (gwt)  (Read 44392 times)
smwalsh75
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2


« on: Thursday 09 July 2009, 04:11:36 am »

Keeping ahead of my kids to limit the social media sites (myspace, facebook, etc) sites has been quite a cat and mouse game.  Wasn't bad until my 13 year old realized the joy of proxy sites - have been able to deal with most - it takes her more than an hour now to find one that half-works...  But now she stumbled on the google wireless transcoder...

Endian Firewall Community release 2.2.rc2 (c) 2004-2008 is what I currently run.  I have blocked SSL to keep the proxy traffic "viewable" and do alot with keyword matching "banned phrase" is what she sees alot...  My latest challenge...

the google wireless transcoder -- there are a few variations of the url - I do not want to blacklist the google.com domain.  I searched this site and others and couldn't find a discussion on the topic.

I thought the firewall had the ability to rewrite URLs as they are requested.

I'm looking for advice on how to take any requested URL matching "google.com/gwt" and redirect the request to a specific domain (maybe back to www.google.com or to disney or something...)

Any advice?    Thanks!!

Logged
smwalsh75
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2


« Reply #1 on: Friday 10 July 2009, 07:19:48 am »


Squid ACL in squid.conf...

acl gwt1 url_regex ^http://www.google.com/gwt/n.
http_access deny gwt1

seems to be doing a good job.

thoughts?  better ways to do this?

Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Page created in 0.047 seconds with 18 queries.
Powered by SMF 1.1 RC2 | SMF © 2001-2005, Lewis Media Design by 7dana.com