Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
Saturday 21 December 2024, 05:33:40 pm

Login with username, password and session length

CLICK HERE for the The official Endian Roadmap and Issue tracker
14262 Posts in 4377 Topics by 6517 Members
Latest Member: Sandro
Search:     Advanced search
+  EFW Support
|-+  Support
| |-+  General Support
| | |-+  Confused by new efw-shell
0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Confused by new efw-shell  (Read 12129 times)
trymes
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 36


« on: Friday 04 February 2011, 03:36:31 am »

OK, so I am prepping another Endian box for deployment, and I used the 2.4.1 ISO.

Anyhow, my 2.4 box always presented me with a regular shell, and I could run efw-upgrade from the command line and it works fine (used it the other day). Now, however, I type "0" at the console and am presented with efw-shell, not bash or tcsh or whatever was used previously (this change is noted in the release notes).

No biggie, I just type "efw-upgrade" at the prompt and am told "Invalid command, type 'help' for help". So I do, and I am not presented any options for upgrade, but I do see "Login", so I try it and it asks for my root password. OK. Still no efw-upgrade. So I dig around using ls and find it in /usr/local/bin.

Now I can run it by specifying the full path, but shouldn't be necessary, should it?

Also,  there are no packages available for update? Can it actually be that the problem with updates reported in early December is still not fixed?

Tom
Logged
TheEricHarris
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 86


« Reply #1 on: Monday 07 February 2011, 04:24:34 pm »

After you issue the 'login' command enter your root password, you can type in 'bash' a bash shell.

I just SSH into the box and that works better.
Logged
trymes
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 36


« Reply #2 on: Tuesday 08 February 2011, 06:12:17 am »

OK, I'll bite. What is the point of the efw-shell? why not just stay with bash?

Tom
Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Page created in 0.063 seconds with 18 queries.
Powered by SMF 1.1 RC2 | SMF © 2001-2005, Lewis Media Design by 7dana.com