Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
Tuesday 26 November 2024, 01:34:53 am

Login with username, password and session length

CLICK HERE for the The official Endian Roadmap and Issue tracker
14261 Posts in 4377 Topics by 6517 Members
Latest Member: Sandro
Search:     Advanced search
+  EFW Support
|-+  Support
| |-+  General Support
| | |-+  LAN with different subnet and different DHCP
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: LAN with different subnet and different DHCP  (Read 13238 times)
drenda81
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2


« on: Friday 22 May 2015, 07:14:42 am »

I'm trying to configure efw community in my network where I've 3 managed
switch and 8 VLANs.
Every VLAN has a different subnet and should have a different DHCP.

Seems this configuration is not manageable in efw because there are only 3
zones (only a zone permit to define a subnet).

Why this choise. In pfsense this configuration is possibile, why in endian is not?

Which is the correct way to manage 8 VLAN with endian?

Thanks


--
Daniele
Logged
mrkroket
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 495


« Reply #1 on: Saturday 23 May 2015, 12:12:47 am »

There is not correct way to manage more than 3 zones on endian.
It's a pity, but you must group the VLAN's on these 3 zones, and if you need DHCP server on endian you must manually tweak the dhcp.conf.tmpl template.

Also check
http://help.endian.com/entries/25391848-How-to-split-a-zone-in-sub-zones
for correctly separating traffic between VLAN's. If you don't do that you can have a nice packet storm (I made only by connecting 2 endians on the same VLAN's).

Logged
drenda81
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2


« Reply #2 on: Saturday 23 May 2015, 12:18:27 am »

Thanks for your reply. And renouncing to dhcp server, I can't manage 8 vlans with different subnet defining only rules in the firewall to route traffic?
So I group all vlan in GREEN zone and then I route the traffic on subnet based.

You spoke about "packet storm". Do you mean that doing this the firewall could became a bottleneck?

Thanks
Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Page created in 0.063 seconds with 17 queries.
Powered by SMF 1.1 RC2 | SMF © 2001-2005, Lewis Media Design by 7dana.com