Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
Thursday 28 March 2024, 10:21:18 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Download the latest community FREE version  HERE
14247 Posts in 4376 Topics by 6489 Members
Latest Member: GB-gattoboy
Search:     Advanced search
+  EFW Support
|-+  Support
| |-+  EFW SMTP, HTTP, SIP, FTP Proxy Support
| | |-+  Access Policy and Time not being reported correctly
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Access Policy and Time not being reported correctly  (Read 6746 times)
amasek
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2


« on: Friday 10 September 2010, 05:55:57 am »

Hi

Version 2.4

I have 5 policy rules

Rule 1 Filters on IP, using 'Content1' and works just fine
Rule 2 Filters on IP, using 'content3'  and works just fine

Rule 3 Filers on all green zone, 'access denied' MTWHFAS from 21:00-24:00     sometimes works
Rule 4 Filers on all green zone,  access denied  MTWHFAS from 00:00-7:30    sometimes works

Rule 5 filters on all green zone using 'content2' always and works just fine

My issue is that I want the green zone blocked with no access from 9:00 pm to 7:30 am, with content filtering during the rest of the time.  The Denied seems to work however not during the times that I have setup. The firewall gives me the correct time when i look at the time server, I have checked my setup have the correct time zone.

However the logs all seem to be reporting a time 5 hours ahead of my actual time which the denied access rules seem to be following

any ideas would be great

thanks in advance....


Logged
mrkroket
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 495


« Reply #1 on: Friday 10 September 2010, 08:30:58 am »

Maybe some issue with GMT+-N hours.
How do you checked your time?
Logged
amasek
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2


« Reply #2 on: Friday 10 September 2010, 08:51:20 am »

I just check it thru the Services>Time Server Menu...
While i have been using different versions of this firewall for a  of years, i know just enough about it to be dangerous.
If there is a better way to check this please let me know...

Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Page created in 0.047 seconds with 18 queries.
Powered by SMF 1.1 RC2 | SMF © 2001-2005, Lewis Media Design by 7dana.com